Homeland Defense, History of Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2500 words

Homeland apology, History of - Case Study Examplehomeland. The refusal of the U.S. to negotiate with rebels or terrorists and its eagerness to punish advocates of terrorist act has formed the situation as well (Jordan, 2002). Current terrorist organizations are becoming ever more engaged in taking lives than acquiring political agreements, and the fearfulness of retaliations has resulted in a bigger need for underground operations and possible deniability among terrorist organizations and their patrons (Gingrich, 2009). The rise of global and nonstate organizations hence has led to opponents who are harder to monitor and prevent than countries are and who are more engaged in initiating destructive occurrences (Larson & Peters, 2001). Technology also serves a vital function. There are growing concerns about the production of weapons of troop destruction (WMD). These involve fears about unstable ex-Soviet nuclear, biological, and chemical (NBC) weapons or, by means of attempts by purported rogue states and highly subsidized organizations like Osama Bin Laden and Aum Shinrikyos group, the growing capability to produce or obtain such weapons (Gingrich, 2009). Likewise, the escalating shipment and range of ballistic missile systems has brought about fears about opponents possible capability to endeavor the U.S. (Jordan, 2002). Lastly, technological developments in information and communication technologies (ICT) have curtailed the value of geography and facilitated assaults on information and communication structures and other computer-reliant structures from all over the world (Nicholson & Biden, 2005). These move developments also have been disrupted by several attacks abroad and at home that has emphasized the defenselessness of developed states against terrorism, like the United States (Nicholson & Biden, 2005), and has led to umteen injuries and fatalities. As cited in Cordesman (2002), as explained in the Report of the Presidents Commission on Critical Infrastructure Protection (1997), the Report of the National defensive measure Panel (1997), the Federal Emergency Management Agencys evaluation of federal outcome management capacities in 1997, and the account of the DoD Tiger aggroup on incorporation of National Guard and Reserve endorsement of the responses to attacks of WMD, these trends have encouraged policy-level interest to the issue and the recognition of several weaknesses in the nations ability to reduce or prevent the approaching threats (Cordesman, 2002). The approaching threats and weaknesses in response also have resulted in the distribution of important resources to the management and disincentive of the outcomes of terrorist assaults against the U.S. and to critical discussion about the bounds of a homeland security, or currently referred to as homeland defense, undertaking for the U.S. armed forces and the Department of Defense (DoD) (Larson & Peters, 2001). The undertaking would back up the national attempt to mitigate the threats and outcomes of potential attacks on the United States. This essay will attempt to give a widely distributed idea of the major policy concerns linked to homeland defense. This will be a critical essay presenting a case study